Archive

Archive for the ‘IT Perspectives’ Category

Fundamentals of Cat 5e

August 31st, 2010 No comments

This week, I have had to return to some networking fundamentals to emphasize a few points regarding how much an IT department can and should do themselves when it comes to network cabling.

At first glance, pulling your own network cables seems like a cost effective way to save money for a company. Many might make their own patch cables, after ordering the cable in bulk. While the fundamentals of the “do-it-yourself” network cabling project are straight forward, there are a few considerations that go into choosing the right cable for the job which often get overlooked.  This may help you when you are staring at that box of network cable, wondering how it compares to the box right next to it.

It can also be used as material to present to management if you change the title to “Why organizations should outsource network cabling projects to people who know what they are doing.”

Patch Cables are not for Wall Cabling

There is a difference in patch cabling versus normal wall cabling.  Don’t buy one for the other.  It is as fundamental as the reason an electrician use different wire in the wall than you do for an extension cord.

Wall cabling is made of solid wire.  Just like the electrical wire in your home, it is expected that this wire will sit unmoved as it connects the connection in the wall back to the source or patch panel.

Just like the extension cords in your home or on your appliances, Patch Cabling is made of stranded wire.  Many small wires wrapped together make continuous movement of the cable possible; reducing the likely hood it will break.  This is the wire that goes from your computer, back to the wall, or from the patch panel, back to the network switch.

The physical differences are enough that you don’t want to change the roles of these two types of cables.  The cabling has an entire industry of connectors relying on the wire to be solid or stranded in order to successfully connect and stay connected.

Pre-Decision on UTP Cat5e

There are different grades of cable available when you approach your networking project.  I will fast forward the conversation as most people find themselves looking at Cat 5e UTP cable as a standard.  The UTP is Unshielded Twisted Pair, and the category number represents the performance of the cable as it was tested and approved.  Yes, there is category 6, but the release of category 5 enhanced (that’s where the 5e comes from) has been approved for gigabit traffic and has such an arguably close tolerance to category 6, that most people find themselves at category 5e.

UTP Shielding Options

Here is one of the more overlooked options that seem to be overlooked.  While the internals of our Cat 5e cable defines the quality of the data that runs over it, there are different jacketing materials and classifications for the outside of the cable itself which can be important.   Most of these derived from general wiring requirements for fire code.

All bulk format UTP network cable comes with a different rating in order to meet different UL-NEC requirements.  This is the rating of the National Electric Code, which is published by the National Fire Protection Association.  The majority of what you find available will be labeled CM, CMG, CMR, or CMP, while you might stumble upon a CMH or a CMX.

The good news is that you can put them in a ranking order, with CMP at the top, but when you consider cabling an entire facility and you don’t need CMP, then the cost is significant enough to recognize the alternatives.

The ‘P’ in CMP is for Plenum.  In HVAC world if any part of your air flow that would go through your heating or air flow system is referred to as plenum.  This would include inside of the ducts themselves or in areas where return air is cycled above ceiling tiles.   These cables are meant to have a low-smoke and are less toxic when the jacket material burns.

The ‘R’ in CMR is for ‘Riser’.  Riser cables are designed to prevent the spread of fire from floor to floor and are setup for vertical shaft applications. If you are running cable from one floor to another, CMR would the minimum.  They may be overkill in a residential application, as they were designed to separate fire zones.

CMG and CM are the general cables to be used everywhere else.  They pass the vertical flame tests, and most likely the cables you will install in a residential application.

US & Canada Fire certifications (Source – Wikipedia)

Class            Acronym                        Standards

CMP            Plenum                        CSA FT7 [11] or NFPA 262 [11](UL 910)

CMR            Riser                                    UL 1666

CMG            General purpose            CSA FT4

CM                                                   UL 1685 (UL 1581, Sec. 1160) Vertical-Tray

CMX            Residential                        UL 1581, Sec. 1080 (VW-1)

CMH                                                  CSA FT1

Testing 123

While most departments have a cable tester able to light up a fancy LED light when their cable is successfully connected, few possess the equipment to truly diagnosis network cabling.  Unshielded Twisted Pair cable is designed to have different twists of cabling in order to prevent noise or attenuation in the cable.  While a blinky LED light will tell you if you have the right cable hooked up at both ends, it falls short on telling you that you have a connection capable of transmitting data across.  After you invest the money in the material, the time, and the equipment to make your cabling project come true, you might want to consider outsourcing it next time to a company specialized in network cabling.

Categories: IT Perspectives Tags:

Now Recommending: Microsoft Security Essentials

April 5th, 2010 No comments

Despite what is happening in technology on a global, corporate, or even economic scale, there are a few questions that people never stop asking that bring it all back into reality for me.  Only slightly less popular than “what computer should I buy” is the age old question of “What anti-virus software should I use?”.  For the record, I don’t like any of the anti-virus software available. Knowing that, my selection process is which one seems to be the better of the worst options available.  I wouldn’t pay for any of the commercial ones available, so up until now I would recommend AVG’s free anti-virus.  It seems that Microsoft themselves have brought a formidable solution to the table and decided to offer it for the right price to pay attention to…free.

In October of 2009 Microsoft released their Microsoft Security Essentials software as an anti-virus solution for Windows XP, Vista and 7 machines.  After 5 months of poking it with a stick, I have changed my recommendation to anybody who asks what anti-virus to use.  Microsoft has filled in a large hole with in their missing suite of security and delivered it quietly.

I rarely throw Microsoft’s name into the same sentence as security software.  I also think the big names solutions miss the mark when it comes to filling in only the missing holes in an otherwise stable operating system. Over the past 5 years the anti-virus market has turned into bloat-ware, delivering solutions that took over every aspect of your operating system from networking to browser applications. Somewhere in these bloated suites they also have anti-virus software, setup to monitor and scan for known infected files.  As a consumer it has almost been difficult to find a solution that only offers anti-virus.

Don’t I need all of that other stuff?

Service Pack 2 in Windows XP marked a pivotal moment in security for all Windows machines. It was this update which turned on your Windows Firewall by default.  I remember what life was like before that update, as virus protection was a serious problem as viruses spread through networks like wildfire.  Adding another layer of software and protocols on top of the ones already in place risk bringing things to a crawl.

What it does right

  • Free always sits well with people.  I learned a long time ago that some of the best software available is free. It certainly makes it attractive to not have to pay a yearly extortion fee for software that might catch the viruses.
  • It is simple to install. I sent my mother-in-law a 4 step instruction of download – uninstall old – reboot – install and I got an email back 20 minutes later with her telling me it was done.
  • It let’s you control what you want to scan, where you want to scan and when you want to scan.  The simple settings that can either strangle a piece of software or set it free.
  • It is happy running quietly in the corner. There are few annoying pop ups telling you to buy into something or to allow something to happen.
  • It is lite.  By allowing the operating system to use it’s naturally established utilities like the firewall, it doesn’t seem to completely strangle the operating system.  Somebody more ambitious than I am will need to run some statistics on that one.

Why haven’t I heard about this?

You might begin to wonder why Microsoft doesn’t just build this into their operating system suite.  After years of anti-trust agreements and the creation of a software security industry, the software giants hold more control of this fact than Microsoft does.  Microsoft needs to leave this as a third party application to keep the major powers at peace. It also attributes to why Microsoft isn’t pushing the marketing of this software or why you might not have known.

I do not think Microsoft Security Essentials is the final answer in security, but I think it is the best option off the market to fill in that void of protection for home users.  Without some standardized practices like maintaining your software updates, isolating your computer from the Internet and not clicking on everything you are presented with from a webpage, this software will not save you. Neither will that other software you paid too much for.

Categories: IT Perspectives Tags:

Facebook Survival for the Conflicted Organization

March 10th, 2010 No comments

I have written posts in the past about Facebook, giving advice on how to manage and secure your profile. For the most part it was mean to cover your everyday stalker or control the face time you have with somebody you barely remember from high school 20 years ago.
Today I had the same Facebook presentation with a much more serious context.  Instead of protecting your Facebook profile against weird acquaintances from high school, imagine throwing a layer of HIPAA on top of that concern.  Not to be taken lightly are the legal ramifications it has if your friend request is from a patient or consumer. Protecting the confidentiality that you can even acknowledge you know this person will get you into hot water with the strickest compliancy officer.

Unfortunately my presentation and speech were as un-0fficial as I could make them placing me once again in the secret change agent role.  So why the secret identity or even the un-official nature of a corporate discussion on Facebook?

The Love Hate Turmoil over Facebook

Every organization, corporation, medical facility around the country is undergoing a state of mental turmoil over social networking and Facebook.  The problems are easy to identify from the shoes of the HR department.  They struggle against the losses in productivity, legal risk of what employees might say online, and the negative impact it has on the company name.  Pitted up against this struggle is the risk of loosing employee moral, the legal ramifications of policing an employees personal opinion, and really the inability to try and control something, which, can not be controlled.

Protect Thyself

While the HR department fights to come up with policies on social networking, there is still an important need within the walls of organizations around the country.  Teach the people who use Facebook how to protect themselves, and you will protect the organization.

Today’s presentation was a play on the basic premise that seems to be working.

Create Lists > Add People to Lists > Restrict Content to the list

Start with Greg’s Facebook Survival Guide which links to the two other posts on Facebook Protection. While Facebook continues to update their interface, the process is the same.

Here is the presentation itself from today, as a PDF file. Facebook_Survival_Guide-10March2010

Questions and Answers

Block it ALL? - While I have a lot of people and am rather protective of the content I put online, an excellent perspective came out of today’s discussion.  Block everything, and add people to groups to gain privileges.  By nature, this plays into how the lists work, and IS a natural setup and progression. As of right now, if you add somebody to TWO lists, the applied permissions take the least restrictive perspective of the two.

Check my Public Profile? – By nature when you click on the View my Profile button available in the

Privacy Settings, you are looking at your public profile.  If in doubt, you can logout and navigate back to your own page.

Categories: IT Perspectives Tags:

WordPress Malware Cleanup on isle Kamagra

February 21st, 2010 No comments

I managed to loose half of my day yesterday, thanks to a malware infection on the One Lap blog.  It was more like an irritating rash really, but one that scarred our front page with a link to some off branded male enhancement drug.  I wish you could just buy the little blue pills like Advil, as it would eliminate 90% of SPAM, malware and exploits on the Internet.  It almost pains me to put the name of the site in this post, as I know they win by propagating their name once again.

After backing everything up and changing all of the account logins, I had the not-so pleasant task of finding the infection. Following the path of most repair work, I started with Google.  I also found a lot of dead ends and blanket fixes.

I figured I would dump some of the more useful links I could find up here, to help the next soul looking to get rid of the annoying link on the top of their website for kamagra.  Most of the first searches out there, have you hacking away at unknown base64 files, eventually resulting in a complete lobotomy of your site functionality before it is rebuilt with new files.

Run through some best practices first and reset your account passwords for the site, including your FTP accounts.  Realistically the attacker used an SQL injection, allowing them to write straight to the database.  These holes are common during the flexible days before the patches are released.  If you were lucky, the only thing that was added was an annoying link.  So far, that is the only thing I have found.

The code was found in the WP_OPTIONS table in the database, which is where the plugins and other toys get to write to for WordPress. Search through the table for some key words and you will find the inputted entry.  Delete the entire entry and the text goes away. It sounds much easier, now that I know where to look.

Here is the discussion again, between a site owner who knows more than the people offering advice. http://wordpress.org/support/topic/304847

There were a couple useful tools to help parse through this crap.  The Exploit Scanner Plugin, helped draw out some of the code that didn’t look right.  Use with caution and don’t just delete everything it says.

http://wordpress.org/extend/plugins/exploit-scanner/

That helped me pull out the code that was not supposed to be there, allowing me to find the first post of where it was hiding. Their example didn’t have the little pill as the problem, so I didn’t see it initially as I was searching for our miracle drug.

t’+'yle’;
var _0xd22c=["function seeThat(elem) { eval(x22elem.x22+stl+x22.display=x27blockx27;x22); }"];
_0xd22c[0x0] = _0xd22c[0x0].replace(/block/i,”none”);
eval(_0xd22c[0x0]);
<
2c[0x0] = _0xd22c[0x0].replace(/block/i,”none”);
eval(_0xd22c[0x0]);
</script>
<script>
var str = ‘seeThat(document.getElementById(“link”));’;
eval(str.replace(/link/i,’w
r = ‘seeThat(document.getElementById(“link”));’;
eval(str.replace(/link/i,’wraps’));
</script>

Here is the output of the plugin, which the most useful piece of information was the credit_text2 information.  That is the name of the field in the database.
Most hosting sites come with a database admin tool like  mySQLAdmin, or something similar.  If  you don’t know what  you are doing in the database from a shell, then resort to clicking on the icons and digging through it there.
Good luck.

The Morning After

Having a small celebration after getting the malware off of your WordPress site, only to find the next morning the code is right back on the top of your site?  Well we only removed the entry in the database on the first round. Now we need to get rid of the code setup to run to put it back in place on a scheduled basis.

Now we need to dig into where this is being initiated from.  If you search through your files for credit_text2, you won’t find anything.  That is because they have encoded the text itself inside of a function file you don’t actually need.

Inside of the header.php file, there was a call to a start_template() function, directly after the body.  If you open up the

start_template.php file, you find a pile of encoded garbled junk.

Take the meat of that junk, and use one of the freely available Base 64 Decoders online to decode the file.

http://www.opinionatedgeek.com/dotnet/tools/Base64Decode/

In this particular case, the code was coded twice.  So take the output of the first round of decoding, and run it through the decoder again.

That presents us with the following code. If you notice the time reference, you now see why this annoyance comes back around.

Now our second round of cleanup to see if we can last 24 hours without getting a return of the exploit.

  • Delete the function call out of the header.php & remove the call to the require_once line that names the license file.  There are valid calls to these files in my theme, which tells me the entire theme may have been exploited.
  • If you delete the start_template.php file and it breaks the site, it is probably being called as required once some place else.  Start by removing everything from the file, or leaving only the PHP call in the file.
Categories: IT Perspectives Tags:

Countdown to the HITECH Act

February 17th, 2010 1 comment

My role as a secret change agent takes on many disguises. My technology credentials are strong enough to move me throughout the nerd community undetected.  As technology brings businesses, communities, and people together, I am able to stretch my legs into new areas, leveraging my technology credentials as  a form of VIP card.  Now I find myself in a new, though not unfamiliar role inside of the world of medical legislation. With an official title of IT Coordinator, I now carry the badge of HIPAA security officer.  Take the fast moving world of technology, watch the reaction when you mix in government legislation and the medical community, and you have the perfect train wreck for a change agent to prevent.

One year is a lifetime for technology, but one year moves really fast in the world of legislation.  While HIPAA policies are based off of legislation, meetings and adjustments representing a rather painful process from a change agent perspective, the technology screws were tightened this year, causing some growing pains throughout the HIPAA community.  Tomorrow is the one year anniversary of the HITECH Act, which also marks the deadline to implement the Act. Before we celebrate the anniversary, let’s run down what this means and what we missed.

The Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act (HITECH Act) was part of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA)of 2009 or the economic stimulus plan that came about in February 2009. It has a series of dates and deadlines throughout the year, bringing us to this 1 year anniversary on February 18th, 2010 when it goes into effect.

If HIPAA was the neighborhood watch, setup to protect us in the medical world with rules and guidelines, the HITECH Act would be Tony Soprano, coming to break your knee caps if you weren’t playing by the rules. It doesn’t tell you how to fix everything wrong with your HIPAA policy, but sets up some pretty strict penalties for when you get it wrong.

Let’s review what happened so far…

February 17, 2009 – HITECH Act Enacted

This setup the application of tiered civil monetary penalties regarding breaches of PHI (Personal Health Information).
Huh? You mean if I loose a whole bunch of medical records, I have to pay for that?
Not only do you have to pay for it, but that is the first thing we are saying above all else. We will collect money and we must collect money when a breach is found. Not to worry, because later in 2010 we get to define what to do with that money.

April 20, 2009 – (60 Days)

Human Health Services must set forth a list of technologies and methodologies that render information “unusable, unreadable or indecipherable.”

Result: section 13402(h) of the Act, which really should be called the “Oh, that’s what encryption is” Act. While the tech industry knew what encryption meant, the medical world didn’t want to listen. Frankly, they made up their own interpretation of what encryption was and it was painful.

HHS & FTC Guidance Rules

August 18, 2009 – (180 Days)

HHS and FTC must each publish “interim final” regulations on breach notification. These regulations apply to breaches discovered on or after the “interim final” regulations have been published.

Result: Section 13402 of Subtitle D

There is an entire layering system defining who you are required to tell and notify if you loose information, starting with the owner of the information you lost. It is rather thick, but on the scary side of things people are legally bound to notify the news media if you breach over 500 records.  The new focus is also on the Burden of Proof, requiring everybody to prove that they notified everybody and that the message was received.

December 31, 2009 -

Due date for the HHS to adopt rules for the first set of standards regarding disclosures and accounting for disclosures. Then they have a 6 month stopwatch starting which requires them to implement the standard.

You are going to want to read up on Sec. 13405 for this one.  That defines what the HHS needs to have in order to process all of this information they are about to unleash.  This covers what needs to be disclosed, what can’t be disclosed, how long you need to prove that you disclosed the information and a few other guidelines to make sure you follow through. I read through it and ran out of white boards to draw the number of clauses.

February 18th 2010

This marks the date when everything is adhered to and organizations are responsible for following the legislation. The HIPAA Survival Guide site, setup a great breakdown of what just happened and what is about to take effect and do a much better job tying it all together, but here is the summary of what is happening.

  • Organizations are to apply the rules, are accountable for their consequences along with all business associates.
  • Patient’s right to restrict disclosures to health plans.
  • Deeming of limited data set as satisfying the minimum necessary standard.
  • Patient’s right to electronic access to, and an electronic copy of, their health record.
  • Clarification regarding marketing provisions.
  • Opt-out for fund raising communications; HIPAA’s current provisions regarding fund raising remain in full force an effect.
  • Clarification regarding the ability to impose criminal penalties against individuals.
  • Civil monetary penalties and settlements flowing to HHS/OCR (Office of Civil Rights) for enforcement.
  • Requirement for HHS to begin conducting mandatory audits.

The last one is important. (hence the powerful red color) No longer does the HHS only hold the right to conduct audits, they are required do. Now that the legislation is in place for the monetary values, they will hold audits, and they will collect your money.

What do I expect to really see out of this?   6 months from now, they want to review all of the initial findings from the audits and report back to the federal government.  I would predict that things will not be as secure as they “envisioned” when they wrote the act in the first place.  The government will tighten the screws a little more, legislation will react, and we will fall into a cycle that keeps us chasing stronger regulations.

That prediction isn’t what will happen, because there are factors in the mix that nobody wants to acknowledge.   Without tipping my entire hand, let’s just say that my work as a secret change agent is just beginning.

Regardless, nobody wants to be involved in the first round of audits, including the auditors.  So expect some scrambling around and tidying up as the first wave reaches the shore.

Categories: IT Perspectives Tags:

Leveraging Facebook Pages

February 4th, 2010 No comments

Facebook allows anybody to start a Group or a Page, but is not until you have actually created one do you understand which direction to pick.

Adding a Facebook Page should be part of every business owners “list of free tools I should take advantage of on the Internet to enhance viral marketing”.  As of this post, you can not magically transform a group into a page without having some sort of VIP card into the support team of Facebook, so I wanted to offer some insight as to why your business should have a page setup.

Search Engine Journal has a nice comparison chart between a group and a page if you are still the fence about which one to choose.

From a marketing perspective, the Page offers a few distinct advantages.

  1. A page can be viewed by non Facebook members.  Among a list of reasons why that is powerful is the fact that it opens up the page to be indexed by the search engines.
  2. A page will provide statistical analysis in terms of users, time online, demographics, all in the form of what they call “Insights”.

Don’t laugh too hard that I have two empty graphs here.  I created this particular Facebook Page while I wrote this post. The idea is that I can return to you in 6 months and show you how to interpret the trends and turning them into useful information.  That is of course if I get anybody to add the page.

Last year we took an epic journey into the racing world by establishing a team to run in the One Lap of America.  We started a Facebook group, allowing us to coordinate members of that group, schedule meeting events, and create some communication paths for people to follow us.  We didn’t know it then, but what we needed was a page.

Facebook Page of RochesterDSM One Lap Team

While we were not a business, we wanted to use the page for the same reasons, which was to promote our escapades across the country.

The Facebook Page becomes a free extension of your own website, allowing you to have instant access to a photo gallery, discussion boards and resources that allow fans of your product to keep up to date and help spread the word.

Updating the page is amazingly easy for a team traveling across the country with limited internet access, as they allow you to even post updates by providing you with an email address.  Setting up the page to tie back into Twitter and becomes quite a useful resource for getting information updates published.

If you own a business, setup a Facebook Page. If you want to promote a brand, setup a Facebook Page.  If you want to have closed door meeting, allowing select members into those meetings without the prying eyes of the Internet, setup a Facebook Group.

Categories: Automotive, IT Perspectives Tags:

iPad Micro SIM Lockdown

February 1st, 2010 No comments

In case you missed the technical specs of the new Apple iPad, you may have overlooked the word “micro” in front of the SIM card slot on the iPad.  That can be read a couple of ways, and certainly will be touted as a move to the new standard by Apple and AT&T.

It really can’t be a standard, when the rest of the planet still conforms to a standard SIM card size for every device. The Micro SIM has been slow to adopt, because it is frankly not needed.   Apple’s move to put the Micro SIM card into the iPad can be seen as nothing more than a blocking attempt to keep current data users from putting taking their SIM card out of their iPhone and putting it into the iPad.

That doesn’t mean people won’t try and make it work. The micro SIM card is smaller, yet retains the same contact patch for connectivity. I would certainly trim down a SIM card to see if it works.  You would need to create an adapter ring to put it back in the iPhone.  Seems a little more reasonable than paying for another unlimited data plan.  The industry really needs to stop using the word unlimited in describing anything.

In the mean time, good luck finding a carrier who knows what a Micro SIM card is.  While T-Mobile announced some platform movements in that direction at CES this year, the low availability of the cards themselves, will cause some hiccups on rolling out the iPad.  While the rest of the devices on the AT&T network use a normal SIM card, having one device that does not, will certainly cause complications.

Categories: IT Perspectives Tags:

Apple iPad has some battles ahead

January 31st, 2010 4 comments

In the realm of technology, I consider Apple to be what BMW is to automobiles.  They both make beautiful and well engineered hardware which induces an experience more evolved than mere driving or computing.  Apple has done it again this week when they announced their new product, the iPad.  Lying somewhere between a tablet computer and an eBook reader, the iPad is another showpiece of Apple engineering and design.   There was only one flaw in the logic when creating this new revolutionary device.  Apple has gone and created the most beautiful piece of hardware, which nobody needs.

Whether you know it or not, the iPad has many battles on it’s road to gaining consumer acceptance. With such a grand build up of publicity, the expectations are that this device will do more.  More than what we already do in an E Book reader, more than what we already do in a tablet computer, and certainly more than we can do in a netbook.

Where the iPad looses the eBook battle.

The Kindle didn’t win over the market for the excellent hardware design.  With awkward buttons conveniently placed where you need to hold onto the device, the Kindle is no challenging threat at all. Putting the iPad next to the Kindle would clearly expose how superior the Apple product is yet again.  Right?

The widespread adoption of the Kindle had little to do with the hardware.  As long as Apple captures everything that the Kindle does within the eReader experience, they should have no problem winning over that market.  First on that list, is it’s ability to be always connected.

It was impressive that Apple was able to get AT&T to setup non-contractual terms for the iPad. Unfortunately, contract or not, nobody wants to deal with AT&T to get, well, anything.  Especially when the agreement for the data connection on the Kindle all happens in the background.  Having an always connected service is far more magical than my ability to pay AT&T more on a monthly basis.  When you can buy a Kindle and get to download content indefinitely, it doesn’t look good to pay $29.99 a month, or $360 for the first year for unlimited data.

The Apple iPad will have a 10 hour battery life, while in use. Certainly they must mean 10 days, right?  Today most eBook readers last a week without charging.  The entire advantage about NOT having a backlit screen is to use the E ink technology to deliver content without using a lot of energy.

Talking about that E ink technology, don’t expect to bring this iPad outside to the beach, where the glaring sun is really going to do a number on a big glossy display screen.  Not too many people curl up to read a book and look for darkness.

Apple may have missed the book reader demographic, but surely this is a revolutionary tablet computer.

Where the iPad looses the Tablet battle.

I am not sure there is a tablet war. You see, this tablet concept is not new at all.  I still have my Honeywell Webpad from 10 years ago.  While they have gotten rid of the pen for the interface, the iPad misses some key elements if it is to revolutionize the tablet platform.

In true Apple fashion, they couldn’t have just stuck a standard SD card slot or even a USB slot into the side of the iPad. That may have actually made it useful to offloading camera pictures, or replacing that electronic picture frame on the mantel, which is even capable of such an easy task.  Luckily it looks like Apple is nice enough to sell an additional adapter at an inflated cost that will allow that SD card hookup and it comes with one adapter for USB.

It may not be a prominent feature, but there has to be a large concern about dropping this thing. It doesn’t come with the case to protect it, which I can pay for, and I suspect there will be a large after market surge of protective cases. How about a lanyard hookup? I know it sounds like a step backwards, but when I spend that much money on a perfect piece of hardware, I would feel more comfortable falling back to a good string to keep it safe.  In Apple world, I would suspect to see an anti-gravity kit selling for $59 in the Apple store.

Where is the camera?  If the iPad survives it’s first year, the next version better have a camera.  As I was thinking of what this thing could bring to the tablet market, I kept returning to videophones and web conferencing.  Using Skype and webcams to communicate has only made it into the homes the past couple years.  Put that in a wireless device I can walk around the house with, and you may have opened a useful feature on the list.  While my old tablet didn’t have this either, it was 10 years old.

Where the iPad looses the Netbook battle.

Apple refuses to acknowledge my ability to buy a completely usable notebook computer for under $400.  It doesn’t dismiss the fact that I can.

A large part of the Apple presentation was to show off how you can buy iWork for the iPad, indicating that you might be ready to type up your next novel or prepare a presentation on this “revolutionary” platform.

As soon as I finish retro-fitting my entire office with bean bag chairs and turning my typing productivity down to a crawl, I might be ready for an iPad.  It would appear my options are to use my lap, brace the device with one hand, or to purchase a kit that allows me to type with a keyboard.  They have those devices already, in the form of laptops and netbooks. While the iPad would look really cool around that college coffee shop, it would frustrate me as a platform to use regularly for work.

Will the iPad win the war?

We have this beautifully engineered piece of hardware, which we hopefully have under-estimate in potential.  With so many strikes against it, before it hits the actual market, Apple has some work to do in order to make it a success.  As we have learned with the iPhone, the majority of the success comes through a viral adoption of the technology.  So now the pressure falls to the reaction of the consumers and the app developers.  The platform will only survive if it becomes more than it was sold for. That will not happen when it reaches the shelves.

Categories: IT Perspectives Tags:

My living room doesn’t need 3D

January 10th, 2010 No comments

Anaglyph 3D GlassesI remember being 8 years old when all of the kids on the street got together to watch our first 3D movie. It was awesome. A pile of kids in one room with red and blue glasses on all to capture this cool technology. I don’t remember the movie. But what I do remember is that I didn’t get 3D at the time. It didn’t work well enough for me to know whether or not I was seeing something or I wasn’t.  3D has progressed over the years, the glasses have become polarized, but my entertainment value still remains.

I went and saw Avatar in 3D at an IMAX theater.  Yes it looked cool.  Yes you have to go see it. If you are going to see it, it should be done in 3D in IMAX.  Just to clarify, No, I don’t want that in my living room. We were there, in that environment, for that experience.  It was a moment, and now it has passed.

I might be the only one who doesn’t want 3D in my living room.  There were some large players announcing larger investments coming from CES this week. In case you weren’t paying attention here are the highlights to pay attention to.

The Discovery Channel, IMAX and Sony huddled together to deliver the first 3D channel. Press Release

ESPN will be delivering a 3D sports channel. This isn’t a stretch, as they have broadcast 3D events before, as they broadcast college football last year in 3D.

Sony is pushing the platform hard, bringing 3D televisions and throwing the 3D label on top of the rising BluRay name.

Intel had a demo of a 3D television without the glasses.  It’s a move in the right direction, but far from living-room ready.  Intel 3D Demo – Engaget

Panasonic makes a 3D camera you can buy for a mere $21K, if you don’t want to duct tape two normal cameras together.  Though it was not new to CES this year, it has been “officially announced for pre-order” making it still not available.

Photograph: Steve Marcus/Reuters

What does all of this lead to with the innovation and adoption of 3D into my house?  Absolutely nothing. The industry is scrambling to create this false notion that 3D is the next evolving technology and that I need it.  On the list of things I need right now, 3D isn’t it.  You see, 3D has been around most of my life. Yes it has evolved from anaglyph systems to the polarized systems, but I don’t care.

It is depressing to hear that predominant trend for CES in 2010 is 3D.  It means the industry is in trouble so much that it is grasping for anything, falling back on this old friend they have been with for 30 years for support.  It isn’t a surprising move, only depressing. When Panasonic expects to sell one million sets in the first year alone, I almost feel bad for them.  Unless people buy the TV and it happens to have 3D in the feature list, I can’t imagine a flock of anybody stating that they now need 3D.

Will 3D ever capture my attention?  Ever since Princess Leia was able to project herself out from a little droid, I expected that next evolution of technology to show up. I don’t watch many sports now, but if I could fill my living room with the football game or put myself inside the car for a race, with the ability to look around me, you will have my attention.  The current definition of viewing the scene straight ahead and watching for objects to draw my eyes closer than normal “is not the 3D I am looking for”.

Until that day arrives, I wanted to give the industry a few pieces to help gain my attention again. Consider them requirements I will judge against when you bring us your next great 3D revelation.

1. I don’t need to wear apparel to make it happen.  I don’t have a pair of sunglasses that last more than a year, so buying in to some special polarized glasses in order for me to appreciate a show, isn’t going to happen.

2. Keep the cost jump to 3D under 15% of the cost of the hardware I was going to buy anyway.  It might allow you to sneak the hardware into my room if I have to buy the TV anyway.

3. I better be able to get up, walk to the fridge and have the same experience when I look back at the television than when I am in your perfectly measured optimal viewing position.   I don’t watch TV from a perfect “one seat” only position.

Considering my Avatar movie experience was the first time back to a theater in a long time, keep focused on making that 3D experience only get in a theater.  I don’t go to the theater any more, because it is better to watch everything in my living room.  I don’t have to wait long for movies to hit the shelves, so the only thing you can hope for is to offer something in the theater that I can’t get at home.

Categories: IT Perspectives Tags:

UStream Broadcaster – Everywhere is Live

December 10th, 2009 No comments

Today Ustream released an application that allows for live streaming of video for the iPhone. If you are not familiar with Ustream at all, the concept is rather simple.  You plug in a webcam to your computer, setup an account on Ustream and you are broadcasting live online, allowing any number of people to tune in.  Take that functionality, and put it into the pockets of over 30 million iPhone owners and you have just turned the planet into a live show itself.   Sort of…

The app will only work with the iPhone 3G and the 3Gs, which makes sense when it will not work at all over the EDGE network.

While this functionality in a smartphone is not ground breaking technology, nor is it the news. The news is that UStream was able to get Apple to allow the app into the iTunes store.  The larger news is that AT&T let it sneak by, the same week they were publicly denouncing the fact that there data network is in trouble, and urging customers to use data sparingly.

My advice if you have an iPhone, download this application as soon as possible.  I would not be surprised if the news brought an unexpected level of awareness and it would not be beyond Apple to yank the app out of the store.

Trials and Impressions

I heard that this application came out by listening to my podcast on the way to work.  While I was too excited to know that I could have this leve of connectivity in my pocket, I am afraid I would have to wait until I got home to try it out.  You see I work exactly 1.5 miles away from the invisible line that flips me over from a 3G network to an EDGE network on AT&T.  I have to tell you AT&T, it will be in your best interest to bring me a 3G network out to Newark, NY in the not too distant future.

The application itself is quick and slick.  My first test was over my home WiFi, just to see if the functionality was there. The video buffers in the phone, and even has the option to record locally and upload if you are not tied into a 3G signal or perhaps in need of a retake. While I didn’t wait around long enough to get anybody in the chat room, the interface even has the comments posting up on the screen from people chatting.

I did turn off the WiFi and record a quick video and the quality was equally as good.  This is a video walk around narration of our ridiculous Christmas Tree we have in the house. I was pleasantly surprised to find that the quality did not degrade, and will be excited to try it out when there is actual light around to do the camera justice.

While my videos are rather tame in comparison to what is possible, imagine the broadcast capabilities.  I am excited to think of how we can leverage this on One Lap of America 2010.  The largest negative of course being the AT&T network support around the country.

I did mention this technology was not new, only new to the iPhone.  Perhaps one of the larger mobile broadcasting applications is from Kyte, which has been around longer and may be more mature for anybody who has a phone compatible with that software.

Categories: IT Perspectives Tags: