<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple iPad has some battles ahead</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stephenjburke.com/2010/01/apple-ipad-has-some-battles-ahead/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stephenjburke.com/2010/01/apple-ipad-has-some-battles-ahead/</link>
	<description>the exploits of a secret change agent</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Aug 2010 02:09:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Driggs</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenjburke.com/2010/01/apple-ipad-has-some-battles-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Driggs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:30:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenjburke.com/?p=653#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Good review, Stephen.  I think the iPad is neat, but that&#039;s about it.

They say, in business, the trick is to find a need and fill it.  It seems that the iPad fills a need for something bigger than an iPhone, but smaller than a Macbook.  I think they could have done much better, offering a touch screen version of a full featured laptop, maybe even a netbook equivalent.  This thing just sounds like another fancy gadget for the I-gotta-have-it Apple fanbois.

The iPhone is great, even with it&#039;s inability to multi-task or the substandard carrier it saddles Apple customers with.  (Ironic, considering the Apple customer experience, that they would partner with a sluggard like AT&amp;T, but I digress.)  This just seems like a bigger iPhone that doesn&#039;t make calls and accelerates the race to the limits of what the iPhone platform can do.

I think the real measure of success will be seeing how many people who buy the first generation rush right out to buy the second generation in a year because now it has a camera in it.  :shrug</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good review, Stephen.  I think the iPad is neat, but that&#8217;s about it.</p>
<p>They say, in business, the trick is to find a need and fill it.  It seems that the iPad fills a need for something bigger than an iPhone, but smaller than a Macbook.  I think they could have done much better, offering a touch screen version of a full featured laptop, maybe even a netbook equivalent.  This thing just sounds like another fancy gadget for the I-gotta-have-it Apple fanbois.</p>
<p>The iPhone is great, even with it&#8217;s inability to multi-task or the substandard carrier it saddles Apple customers with.  (Ironic, considering the Apple customer experience, that they would partner with a sluggard like AT&amp;T, but I digress.)  This just seems like a bigger iPhone that doesn&#8217;t make calls and accelerates the race to the limits of what the iPhone platform can do.</p>
<p>I think the real measure of success will be seeing how many people who buy the first generation rush right out to buy the second generation in a year because now it has a camera in it.  :shrug</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenjburke.com/2010/01/apple-ipad-has-some-battles-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 03:42:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenjburke.com/?p=653#comment-224</guid>
		<description>The other reason I don&#039;t need one, is because of the iPhone. I can get an iPod touch, and have Apps work with one hand still free. They will need to make a unique app that appeals to the iPad, and it will need to be impressive enough to become a feature.  

Regardless, I would wait to see what the next iteration of the device will be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other reason I don&#8217;t need one, is because of the iPhone. I can get an iPod touch, and have Apps work with one hand still free. They will need to make a unique app that appeals to the iPad, and it will need to be impressive enough to become a feature.  </p>
<p>Regardless, I would wait to see what the next iteration of the device will be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenjburke.com/2010/01/apple-ipad-has-some-battles-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenjburke.com/?p=653#comment-220</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re still missing a big piece of magic. 

A netbook won&#039;t play &quot;apps&quot;.  Only Touches and iPhones... And now iPads.  It is a PSP and Nintendo DS killer.  Free to $0.99 to $5.99 games?   Win. 

Will that be enough to save it?   I hope so.  This is what the future should look like.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re still missing a big piece of magic. </p>
<p>A netbook won&#8217;t play &#8220;apps&#8221;.  Only Touches and iPhones&#8230; And now iPads.  It is a PSP and Nintendo DS killer.  Free to $0.99 to $5.99 games?   Win. </p>
<p>Will that be enough to save it?   I hope so.  This is what the future should look like.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glen Menendez</title>
		<link>http://www.stephenjburke.com/2010/01/apple-ipad-has-some-battles-ahead/comment-page-1/#comment-219</link>
		<dc:creator>Glen Menendez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 21:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stephenjburke.com/?p=653#comment-219</guid>
		<description>Great review. 

This is one of those products that I&#039;m going to have to try to justify to myself.  Nonetheless, I suspect I&#039;ll be one of the very early adopters.  My gut is that I&#039;ll get the one without the 3G so I won&#039;t be tempted to add the service later.  Also, as long as I have my iphone in my pocket, I don&#039;t feel it&#039;s a big deal.  Same with storage space.

Now - if it could do tethering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review. </p>
<p>This is one of those products that I&#8217;m going to have to try to justify to myself.  Nonetheless, I suspect I&#8217;ll be one of the very early adopters.  My gut is that I&#8217;ll get the one without the 3G so I won&#8217;t be tempted to add the service later.  Also, as long as I have my iphone in my pocket, I don&#8217;t feel it&#8217;s a big deal.  Same with storage space.</p>
<p>Now &#8211; if it could do tethering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
